{"id":34,"date":"2016-04-22T04:05:25","date_gmt":"2016-04-22T04:05:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/?p=34"},"modified":"2016-04-22T04:05:25","modified_gmt":"2016-04-22T04:05:25","slug":"in-praise-of-quals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/life-at-mit\/in-praise-of-quals\/","title":{"rendered":"In praise of quals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One\u00a0of the requirements for earning a PhD from MIT (or any university, as far as I know) is to pass a qualifying exam, colloquially known as &#8220;quals.&#8221; Quals vary by department, and the mechanical engineering quals are particularly notorious.\u00a0I think this is partially due to their difficulty and partially due to their unfamiliarity. They are difficult: despite most students preparing for months, the first time quals pass rate is somewhere around 75%. And they are different: a large part of quals is oral exams, where you solve a problem on a blackboard in front of a panel of professors who can ask you questions to probe your approach and your understanding.<\/p>\n<p>To me, the style of quals, which is so different than how students are traditionally tested, should be a reason to celebrate quals\u00a0rather than\u00a0dread them. Almost every engineering class I&#8217;ve taken has had tests, and all of them used the same format: I sat in a room, silently and without access to online resources, and wrote down answers to questions on a piece of paper (even when the course was about the\u00a0use of computer software). I find this testing tradition absurdly contrived: when in your working life will you be given a problem like the ones asked in written exams without access to colleagues or the internet? Admittedly\u00a0written tests are good at assessing how well you can answer test questions, but I think it&#8217;s a far stretch to claim that performance on a written test will accurately assess one&#8217;s competence at solving problems on the job.<\/p>\n<p>The oral exams associated with quals, however, are much more closely aligned to how problems are solved out in the world. You are asked a question that doesn&#8217;t necessarily have a single, clear-cut answer, and you have to convince others that you have a strong enough understanding of the underlying principles for them to trust that your answer is reasonable. This is what I do when I discuss issues regarding experiments with my lab mates or when I field questions after giving a talk at a conference. Which is not to say that the usefulness of this skill is limited to academia &#8211;\u00a0this exercise is central to\u00a0technical consulting, for example, and I imagine that it shows up in every non-rote engineering job out there. I think it&#8217;s only because oral exams are so resource intensive (~3 profs * ~30 minutes per student) that it&#8217;s so uncommon for us to be assessed this way.<\/p>\n<p>I am not arguing that quals are without issue (their high stakes nature makes them inherently stressful), but I would encourage any students taking quals to be grateful for at least some aspects of the opportunity. The novel testing environment is closely aligned with your best interests as a PhD student: by the end of the process, you&#8217;ll have convinced a cadre of MIT professors, through your direct interaction with them, that you are deserving of a PhD from MIT. The same could not be said had you simply completed another battery of written exams.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One\u00a0of the requirements for earning a PhD from MIT (or any university, as far as I know) is to pass a qualifying exam, colloquially known as &#8220;quals.&#8221; Quals vary by department, and the mechanical engineering quals are particularly notorious.\u00a0I think this is partially due to their difficulty and partially due to their unfamiliarity. They are &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/life-at-mit\/in-praise-of-quals\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;In praise of quals&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-life-at-mit"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35,"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34\/revisions\/35"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/laweinstein.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}